Skip to content

Properly mark untested functions and lines as not covered #1078

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

gufoe
Copy link

@gufoe gufoe commented May 20, 2025

This PR fixes #1060 .
I am not sure the patch is properly made but by running a few tests i see it works.

@sebastianbergmann
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for your contribution. I appreciate the time you invested in preparing this pull request. However, I have decided not to merge it.

@gufoe
Copy link
Author

gufoe commented May 20, 2025

Sure I understand, would you be so kind as to include the motivation for the rejection?
Is the current behaviour the intended one?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Lines with 0 executions should be marked as "Non covered"
2 participants